EU, US at odds over jab supply

COPENHAGEN: The European Union voiced skepticism on Friday over the United States’ sudden push to waive Covid vaccine patents to boost supply to poorer countries, while defending its own record as the world’s biggest exporter of doses.

“An IP waiver will not solve the problems, will not bring a single dose of vaccine in the short- and medium-term,” European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen told a news conference at an EU summit in Portugal, using an abbreviation for “intellectual property.”

That position was echoed by

French President Emmanuel Macron, who stressed that the bigger problem was US and British export restrictions on vaccines and their raw materials.

“The Anglo-Saxons block many of these ingredients and vaccines,” he told reporters. “Today 100 percent of the vaccines produced in the United States are for the American market.”

That contrasts with the EU’s export so far of more than 200 million vaccine doses, which von der Leyen has said shows Europe is “the pharmacy of the world.”

Their remarks reflect European consternation at the US aboutface this week to support the suspension of vaccine patents, as pushed for by the World Health Organization and countries such as India and South Africa.

Most EU leaders said they were not opposed to a debate on the idea, although German

Chancellor Angela Merkel has come out firmly against it, with her government stressing that intellectual property protection is a source of innovation.

“We should be open to this discussion,” von der Leyen said. Macron voiced the same opinion but went on to express “doubts about how effective” suspending vaccine patents would be. He said he and Merkel were “hand-inhand” on the issue.

Unlike the EU, the terms of the US contracts prohibit the export of vaccines produced in America. Dose manufacture is also regulated by a US Defense Production Act that restricts exports until Americans are vaccinated first.

EU officials briefing journalists in Brussels on the issue said the hoarding of vaccine inputs by other countries was a larger obstacle to increasing global vaccine production than IP protection.

But, mindful of the risk of the EU being portrayed as a villain against the apparent generosity of the US stance, they stressed openness to Washington’s announcement.

“I believe now the US should come forward and explain exactly the substance of their proposal,” one EU official said. “We have not seen anything but a very general statement.”

The official said that discussions should continue “with those that think that there might be problems with the intellectual property system” but added: “We have not been given a single example where capacity has been restricted because of the protection of patent or other IP rights.”

Another official said that lifting patents, by itself, “will not fix things... it does not mean that you have access to technology or to knowhow.”